AIMA

The Alternative Investment Management Association

Alternative Investment Management Association Representing the global hedge fund industry

Portfolio diversification with gold, silver and platinum bullion

Nick Barisheff

Bullion Management Services Inc

Q3 2006

 

Gold is on the rise. It recently surpassed $645 per ounce, an increase of more than 140% from its low of $254. As of mid-2005, it has increased approximately 30% in all currencies, and is no longer simply reflecting US-dollar weakness. Media coverage attributes these increases to supply shortfalls, geopolitical concerns, rising oil prices, inflation fears and U.S. financial imbalances. The reports typically focus on trading implications, since most investors and analysts think of gold as a short-term speculative trade in an industrial commodity. Platinum and silver have both outperformed gold since 2000, but they have received little attention. There is, however, an important reason why investors should pay attention to precious metals: strategic asset allocation.

Strategic asset allocation ensures a fully diversified investment portfolio by properly balancing asset classes of different correlations in order to maximise returns and minimise risk. While many investors believe their portfolios are diversified, they typically contain only three asset classes – stocks, bonds and cash. Real estate, commodities, precious metals and collectibles rarely form part of most investors’ portfolios. Containing only three asset classes out of seven, such portfolios are clearly not adequately diversified. Precious metals provide effective diversification and improve returns, while at the same time reducing volatility during both bear and bull markets. The old Wall Street saying: “Put 10% of your money into gold and hope it doesn’t work,” still holds true today.

Increasing correlations
 

The validity of this old adage was recently confirmed in a June 2005 study carried out by Ibbotson Associates. Bullion Management Services Inc. commissioned the study, entitled ‘Portfolio Diversification with Gold, Silver and Platinum’. Rather than examine the fundamental reasons behind the current bull market in commodities, it addresses the fact that relatively little research has been done on the role of precious metals in strategic asset allocation. Particular attention was spent on the correlations of precious metals with traditional asset classes, and how this relates to diversification. Importantly, the Ibbotson study did not take into account the various drivers currently contributing to rising prices. Instead, it used current (low) CPI statistics, and projected a continuance of similar performance for equity and bond markets.

Low correlations between asset classes are the basis for diversification. Many investors believe their portfolios are diversified if they contain a mix of stocks, bonds and cash. Unfortunately, correlations between traditional asset classes have been on the rise, resulting in portfolios that are not adequately diversified. From 1926 to 1969, the correlation between annual total returns for US stocks and bonds was an attractive –0.02. Recently, US stock and bond market correlations have increased. This tendency is reflected in the 10-year rolling correlations from 1970 through 2004 that ranged from –0.03 to 0.80. The uncertain diversification benefit, in combination with attractive returns observed in other asset classes, drives the vigour with which opportunities in non-traditional (or alternative) asset classes have been pursued in recent years. The primary method for improving the risk-return characteristics of the efficient frontier is to expand the opportunity set of available asset classes.

Ibbotson’s study examined a 33-year time period from February 1971 to December 2004. While there is data available for gold and silver that predates 1970, it is less pertinent because the U.S. dollar was still convertible to gold at that time, and the price of gold was fixed. After U.S. President Richard Nixon closed the gold window on August 15 1971, the price of gold was allowed to float freely.

Although there is some debate on what constitutes an asset class, it is generally agreed that there are capital assets such as stocks, bonds and real estate, consumable assets such as commodities and store-of-value assets such as currency and fine art. The fact that precious metals are both consumable assets and store-of-value assets is not well understood by the investment community. While the three constituents are all precious metals, gold and silver have a long history as monetary assets and are often viewed as a safe harbour during times of crisis or high inflation. Conversely, during an economic expansion, the commodity demand for silver and platinum is thought to increase.

Since an investment in mining stocks does not provide a direct exposure to precious metals, the study focuses on a direct, physical investment in an equally weighted portfolio or composite of gold, silver and platinum bullion. Ibbotson constructed an equally weighted composite index using gold, silver and platinum bullion, and referred to it as the Spot Precious Metals Index (SPMI). Ibbotson used this Index as a proxy for the precious metals asset class.

The benefits of precious metals
 

Over the entire 33-year period, the three equity asset classes outperformed the other asset classes. The overall performance of the SPMI was closer to that of the fixed income asset classes. The SPMI outperformed both cash and inflation. For over 11 years (May 1973 to August 1984) the SPMI was the top-performing asset class, with the longest run of any of the asset classes. During the low inflation period, the SPMI had the lowest compounded annual return. During the high inflation period, the compounded annual inflation rate was 8.62%, and the SPMI had the highest compounded annual return of 20.83%. For the period studied, precious metals provided a substantial hedge against inflation.

While the standard deviation of the SPMI is quite high in isolation, according to modern portfolio theory it is the interaction of asset classes with each other that provides diversification. Of the 33 years of annual data, there were nine years during which U.S. large-cap stocks had negative returns. During these nine years, the SPMI had the highest average arithmetic return.

Of the 33 years of annual data studied, there were six years that the equally weighted portfolio of traditional asset classes had negative returns. The average arithmetic return of the portfolio of equally weighted traditional asset classes for these six years was negative 3.5%. For the same six years, the average arithmetic return of the SPMI was a positive 13.4%. Precious metals provided positive returns when they were needed most.

Of the seven asset classes, precious metals is the only one with a negative average correlation to the other asset classes. It is also worth noting that, excluding cash, precious metals is the only asset class with a positive correlation coefficient with inflation, which is further evidence that precious metals act as a hedge against inflation.

Figure 1: Historical correlations (1972 – 2004)

Asset Class
U.S. Large Cap Stocks
U.S. Small Cap Stocks
Inter-
national Equity
Spot Precious Metals Index (SPMI)
U.S. Long-term Gov’t Bonds
U.S. Inter-
mediate- term Gov’t Bonds
Cash (U.S. 90 Day Treasury Bills)
U.S. Inflation
U.S. Large Cap Stocks
1.00
0.79
0.59
-0.10
0.28
0.22
0.04
-0.22
U.S. Small Cap Stocks
0.79
1.00
0.47
0.05
0.13
0.10
-0.01
-0.06
International Equity
0.59
0.47
1.00
0.04
0.08
-0.02
-0.10
-0.19
Spot Precious Metals Index (SPMI)
-0.10
0.05
0.04
1.00
-0.18
-0.19
-0.03
0.43
U.S. Long-term Government Bonds
0.28
0.13
0.08
-0.18
1.00
0.93
0.04
-0.39
U.S. Intermediate Term Bonds
0.22
0.10
-0.02
-0.19
0.93
1.00
0.29
-0.22
Cash (U.S. 90 Day Treasury Bills)
0.04
-0.01
-0.10
-0.03
0.04
0.29
1.00
0.63
U.S. Inflation
-0.22
-0.06
-0.19
0.43
-0.39
-0.22
0.63
1.00
Average Correlation (Excluding Inflation)
0.26
0.22
0.15
-0.06
0.18
0.19
0.03
-0.15

 

The historical efficient frontier with precious metals is superior to the historical efficient frontier without precious metals. With the exclusion of the maximum return asset allocation, including precious metals in the opportunity set improved the risk-return tradeoff over the entire historical efficient frontier. Importantly, the allocation to precious metals does not come at the expense of any single asset class, but rather it comes from a reduction in several asset classes. This suggests that the unique risk/reward profile of precious metals makes them a useful diversification tool in strategic asset allocation.

Based on the historical efficient frontiers, Ibbotson found that including precious metals moderately improved the efficient frontier. Allocations ranged from approximately 0% to 9%.

Based on the forward-looking resampled efficient frontiers, asset allocations that include precious metals have better risk-adjusted performance (as measured by Sharpe ratio) than asset allocations without precious metals. Investors can potentially improve the reward-to-risk ratio in conservative, moderate, and aggressive asset allocations by including precious metals with allocations of 7.1%, 12.5%, and 15.7%, respectively. These results suggest that including precious metals in an asset allocation may increase expected returns and reduce portfolio risk.

Figure 2: Asset allocations

 
Conservative
Moderate
Aggressive
Asset Class
With Precious Metals
Without Precious Metals
With Precious Metals
Without Precious Metals
With Precious Metals
Without Precious Metals
U.S. Large Cap Stocks
7.6%
4.5%
20.4%
15.5%
18.1%
19.2%
U.S. Small Cap Stocks
8.0%
10.3%
12.7%
17.6%
34.0%
32.5%
International Equity
6.5%
9.6%
19.7%
21.5%
25.4%
31.6%
Spot Precious Metals Index (SPMI)
7.1%
0.0%
12.5%
0.0%
15.7%
0.0%
U.S. Long-term Government Bonds
3.9%
2.4%
8.2%
8.3%
5.3%
7.9%
U.S. Intermediate Term Bonds
31.0%
30.0%
21.1%
25.4%
0.1%
5.3%
Cash (U.S. 90 Day Treasury Bills)
35.8%
43.2%
5.5%
11.8%
1.5%
3.6%
Expected Return
6.2%
6.0%
9.0%
8.6%
11.6%
11.1%
Standard Deviation
6.0%
6.1%
12.0%
12.0%
18.1%
18.1%
Sharpe Ratio
0.464
0.426
0.472
0.437
0.453
0.428

 

While there are many paper proxies for precious metals that can provide trading opportunities during a bull market, the hedging benefits and protection against ‘fat-tail’ events such as a currency crisis or derivatives accident may only be available if actual bullion is held. Many precious metals investments are simply counter-party liabilities and not an actual investment in bullion. In the event of a counter-party default, the benefits of bullion may not be realised at exactly the time when they are needed most. From a strategic asset allocation point of view, therefore, it is critical that fully allocated, segregated and insured gold, silver and platinum bullion is held.

*All dollar amounts expressed in US currency unless otherwise indicated.

Back to Listing

Main Menu

  1. Home
  2. About
    1. Our Core Objectives
    2. AIMA's Policy Principles
    3. Meet the team
    4. AIMA Council
    5. Global Network
    6. Sponsoring Members
    7. Global Partners
    8. FAQs
    9. Opportunities at AIMA
  3. Join AIMA
    1. Benefits of Membership
    2. Membership Fees
    3. Application form
  4. Members
    1. AIMA DDQs
    2. AIMA Annual Reports
    3. AIMA Governance
    4. AIMA Logo
      1. Policy note
    5. AIMA Members' List
    6. AIMA Review of the Year
    7. Committees and Working Groups
    8. Weekly News
    9. Update Profile
  5. Investors
    1. AIMA Investor Services
    2. AIMA Members' List
    3. Investor Steering Committee
    4. Update Profile
  6. Regulation
    1. Asset Management Regulation
      1. EU Asset Management Regulation
        1. AIFMD
        2. European Capital Markets Regulation
        3. MiFID / MiFIR
        4. UCITS
        5. European Venture Capital Directive
        6. Shareholder Rights Directive
        7. European Long Term Investment Fund Regulation
        8. Loan Origination Funds
        9. Capital Raising
        10. AIFMD-Related Events
      2. US Hedge Fund Adviser Regulations
        1. Registration and Reporting
        2. Incentive-Based Compensation
        3. JOBS Act
      3. Asia Pacific Asset Management regulation
      4. Other Jurisdictions’ Asset Management Regulation
      5. Systemically Important Financial Institutions ('SIFIs')
      6. Remuneration
        1. UK
        2. United States
        3. CRD IV and CRR
        4. AIFMD
        5. MiFID
      7. Shadow Banking
      8. Volcker Rule
      9. Other
      10. Systemic Risk Reporting
      11. Dealing Commission
      12. Corporate Governance
    2. Markets Regulation
      1. Bank/Capital Regulation
        1. Capital Requirements Directive
        2. EU Bank Structural Reforms
      2. Derivatives/Clearing
        1. EMIR
        2. MiFID II / MiFIR - Derivatives
        3. MAD / MAR
        4. Dodd-Frank Act Title VII
        5. Hong Kong
        6. IOSCO
        7. Singapore
      3. High Frequency Trading
        1. ESMA Guidelines
        2. MiFID II / MiFIR - HFT
        3. MAD / MAR
        4. Flash Crash
        5. IOSCO
        6. Germany
        7. CFTC Automated Trading
      4. Insurance Regulation
        1. Solvency II
      5. Market Abuse
        1. MAD / MAR
        2. Indices as Benchmarks
      6. Position Limits
        1. MiFID II - Commodities
        2. CFTC Position Limits
      7. Resolution of Financial Institutions
        1. Europe
          1. EU Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive
          2. EU Non-Bank Recovery and Resolution
        2. CPSS-IOSCO
        3. Financial Stability Board
        4. UK
        5. USA
      8. Short Selling
        1. EU Short Selling Regulation
        2. Hong Kong Short Selling Regulation
        3. US Short Selling Regulation
        4. Short Selling Bans
      9. Securities Settlement
      10. Shadow Banking
        1. International Shadow Banking
        2. EU Shadow Banking
      11. Trading
        1. Dodd-Frank Act
        2. MiFID Portal
    3. Tax Affairs
      1. Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI)
        1. FATCA
        2. EU - AEFI
        3. OECD - Global Standard on AEFI
      2. Australia - Investment Manager Regime (IMR)
      3. Base Erosion - Profit Shifting (BEPS)
      4. FAIFs and FINROFs
      5. FIN 48 and IAS 12
      6. Financial Transaction Tax (FTT)
      7. UK Investment Management Exemption (IME)
      8. UK Offshore Funds Regime
      9. Other
    4. AIMA's Policy Principles
    5. Search
    6. Resources
      1. Guidance Notes
      2. Jurisdictional Guides
      3. Noticeboard
        1. AEOI: FATCA and other regimes
        2. AIFMD
        3. BEPS
        4. CFTC Registration and Exemptions
        5. Corporate Governance
        6. Dealing Commission
        7. Derivatives
        8. FTT
        9. High Frequency Trading
        10. MiFID / MiFIR
        11. Other Hot Asset Management Topics
        12. Other Hot Markets Topics
        13. Other Hot Tax Topics
        14. Position Limits
        15. UK Partnership Tax Review
        16. Trading
        17. Volcker Rule
      4. Hedge Fund Manager Training
      5. Quarterly Regulatory Update
      6. Webinar Programme
      7. Regulatory Compliance Association
        1. About the Regulatory Compliance Association
        2. RCA Curricula and initiatives for alternative investment firms
        3. Meet the regulators and Sr. Fellows
  7. Education
    1. Research
      1. AIMA Research
      2. Industry research
      3. Search research documents
    2. "The Case for Hedge Funds"
      1. Global Hedge Fund Industry Paper: The value of our industry
      2. The Value of the Hedge Fund Industry to Investors, Markets and the Broader Economy: Research commissioned by AIMA and KPMG
      3. The Evolution of an Industry: KPMG/AIMA Global Hedge Fund Survey
      4. Contributing to Communities: A global review of charitable and philanthropic activities by the hedge fund industry
      5. Beyond 60-40: The evolving role of hedge funds in institutional investor portfolios
      6. The Cost of Compliance: Global hedge fund survey by AIMA, MFA and KPMG
      7. Capital Markets and Economic Growth: Long-term trends and policy challenges
      8. Apples and Apples: How to better understand hedge fund performance
      9. The Extra Mile: Partnerships between hedge funds and investors
      10. Key articles by AIMA on the case for hedge funds
    3. AIMA Journal
      1. Recent issues
      2. Search AIMA Journal articles
      3. AIMA Journal Archive
    4. AIMA Guides to Sound Practices
    5. AIMA guides for institutional investors
    6. CAIA Association pages
      1. Fundamentals of Alternative Investments
    7. Regulatory Compliance Association pages
      1. About the Regulatory Compliance Association
      2. RCA Curricula and initiatives for alternative investment firms
      3. Meet the regulators and Sr. Fellows
    8. Certified Investment Fund Director programme
    9. Services to Start-up Managers
    10. Useful Websites
    11. Glossary
  8. Events
    1. AIMA Events
    2. AIMA webinars
    3. Industry events
  9. Media
    1. Press Releases & Statements
    2. AIMA's blog
    3. Media Coverage
      1. Articles by AIMA
        1. Archive
      2. AIMA in the news
      3. Video interviews
      4. Industry news
    4. Media Contact
    5. Press Materials

Sub Menu

  1. Education
    1. AIMA Journal
    2. Bibliography
    3. CAIA Designation
    4. Research
    5. Roadmap to Hedge Funds
    6. AIMA's Investor Steering Committee Paper
    7. Glossary
  2. Regulatory, Tax, Policy & Government Affairs
    1. AIMA Position Papers
    2. AIMA Responses
      1. Australian Tax Office
      2. Authority for the Financial Markets
      3. Committee of European Banking Supervisors
      4. Committee of European Securities Regulators
      5. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
      6. Dubai Financial Services Authority
      7. European Commission
      8. European Securities and Markets Authority
      9. Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority
      10. Financial Services Authority (UK)
      11. Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau
      12. Guernsey Financial Services Commission
      13. HM Revenue & Customs
      14. HM Treasury
      15. Independent Commission on Banking
      16. IOSCO
      17. Monetary Authority of Singapore
      18. Securities and Exchange Board of India
      19. Securities and Exchange Commission (USA)
      20. Securities and Futures Commission
      21. Singapore Exchange
      22. The Takeover Panel
      23. US House of Representatives / Senate
      24. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
      25. Financial Stability Oversight Council
      26. Financial Stability Board
      27. US Treasury
      28. Internal Revenue Service
      29. US Federal Reserve
      30. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA)
      31. Council of European Union
      32. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing
      33. House of Lords
    3. AIMA Summaries
      1. CESR
      2. European Commission
      3. Financial Services Authority (UK)
      4. HM Revenue & Customs
      5. HM Treasury
      6. IOSCO
      7. Securities and Exchanges Commission
      8. FSOC
      9. CFTC
    4. Guidance Notes
    5. Jurisdictional Resource
    6. AIMA Noticeboard
      1. EU Directive on Alternative Investment Fund Managers
      2. FSA Remuneration Code
      3. Short Selling
      4. US Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
      5. UK Stewardship Code
      6. Securities Law Directive
      7. EU Directive on Alternative Investment Fund Managers - Level II
      8. EU Directive on Markets in Financial Instruments (MiFID)
      9. International Financial Centres
      10. Bribery Act
      11. Market Abuse Directive
      12. MF Global
      13. FATCA
      14. FTT
      15. Other Tax Issues
    7. AIMA Regulatory Update
  3. Sound Practices
    1. Due Diligence Questionnaires
    2. Guides to Sound Practices
  4. Start-Up Service Providers
  5. Useful Websites