AIMA

The Alternative Investment Management Association

Alternative Investment Management Association Representing the global hedge fund industry

An update on the offshore funds consultation - a closer examination of some of the key issues

Dana Ward

Grant Thornton

Q2 2008

 

Introduction

In the winter 2007 issue of AIMA's Journal, Mark Stapleton outlined the key reforms tabled in the offshore funds consultation document released on the 9th October 2007. The consultation document sought responses by the 9th of January 2008. It is clear from the level of participation in the debate on those reforms that this is a key issue for both investors and fund promoters and managers both in terms of potential impact on existing products in the market and the new FAIF product which the FSA had envisaged launching in 2008. One of the key ingredients in wider tax reforms fuelling the debate is the proposed reduction of the Capital Gains Tax rate for individuals to 18 percent.

While tax reform measures are inevitable and indeed desirable in maintaining an effective tax system in the UK, reform should ideally be implemented with minimum disruption to business communities and a clear understanding of the potential impact of those reforms in the context of other proposed tax reforms, while also ensuring that the timing of the reform is appropriate. Uncertainty surrounding the potential application of reform needs to be adequately debated and clarified in advance of its introduction.

We do not propose to revisit the substance of the offshore fund rules and the proposed reforms already outlined by Mark. This article will focus on some of the key issues raised in the debate surrounding the consultation and the potential impact that some of those issues may have on the hedge fund sector. We will explore the issues relating to the timing of the reforms.

Impact of the proposed capital gains tax rate reduction

The proposed reduction of the CGT rate to 18 percent has introduced a dynamic which will mean that achieving capital treatment for UK investors in funds will now become critical to the successful marketing of fund products to UK individuals.

The offshore fund regime was introduced to prevent investors from converting income into capital through rolling up investment in an offshore fund.

Where the offshore fund rules applied and the fund did not meet the conditions to be certified as a distributing fund (one of which was to distribute the greater of 85 percent of income per the accounts or UK equivalent profit), the gain on disposal was not subject to capital gains tax but was instead subject to income tax at the investors marginal rate of tax (potentially 40 percent). In effect, the offshore fund rules enabled HMRC to do the exact opposite of what they were aiming to prevent investors from doing, granting the power to HMRC to convert capital into income.

Where capital treatment applied on disposal, the UK investor benefited from taper relief and the annual CGT exemption and consequently had a lower tax bill.

Historically, the tax rate differential between income and capital treatment was not always a critical factor in investment decisions (excepting investors who are exempt from Capital Gains Tax). The rate differential between income and capital treatment on exit was generally between 16 percent where the investment was held for a 10 year period and 6 percent where the investment was held for 5 years. However, the benefit of the rate differential was countered by the annual UK tax charge at 32.5 percent on the annual dividend paid by a fund, which had to seek distributor status to achieve capital treatment.

With the proposed reduction of the CGT rate and the abolition of taper relief the rate differential between income and capital treatment becomes a much more compelling factor in investment decisions made by UK individuals, as the rate differential moves from a range of 16 percent - 6 percent, to an absolute rate differential of 22 percent. For investments which are not held for the longer term, this is likely to have a very significant impact on the overall return for the investor.

More importantly, the new reforms propose that offshore funds who wish to offer capital treatment will have to report income to UK investors; however, they are not necessarily required to pay that income out to investors by way of dividend. This creates a scenario where although an investor may obtain capital treatment if the fund has reporting status, as outlined in the proposal, the investor may be exposed to what is called the "dry income" scenario, namely, an income tax liability on the reported income but no actual cash dividend to discharge the tax liability with.

In terms of what this means for hedge funds, it is expected that there will be a major drive for hedge funds to seek reporting fund status without giving rise to other adverse consequences for their investors, e.g., dry income and a higher tax rate associated with income tax treatment. While it may not be an issue for hedge funds which are marketed to UK institutional investors, (unless they are UK institutions which are exempt from capital gains) as UK institutions are subject to corporation tax on income and gains, it will have a significant impact on UK resident individuals invested in the hedge fund sector, unless the way in which the reporting fund regime will calculate income accommodates hedge funds and FAIFs in obtaining reporting fund status.


Vehicles within scope of the proposed reforms

Another key issue highlighted is the uncertainty as to which vehicles will be in scope under the proposed regime. There are concerns that the characteristics based approach will be open to interpretation and the consultation paper does not give a clear indication on how a characteristics based approach will be applied. The consultation also makes references to bringing within the scope of the reforms arrangements where investors are able to realise substantially the net asset value of their interest.

The consultation paper has indicated that income transparent vehicles will be excluded from the definition of offshore fund and this has been well received. However the paper is unclear as to whether it is merely sufficient for all vehicles to be simply income transparent or whether there is a requirement for some vehicles e.g., contractual arrangements, in addition to be transparent for capital in order to fall outside the scope of the offshore fund rules.

It is preferable that there is clarity at the outset as to which vehicles are within scope of the reforms, otherwise the scope and application of the reforms are likely to go through an evolution process through the administration of a clearance procedure with the possibility of differing treatments being awarded to funds which are similar in nature and purpose.


Timing and impact of proposals – in the context of other tax reforms

The Finance Act 2007 contained reforms in relation to the definition of a material interest in an offshore fund, which caused some concern and confusion in the industry as to their impact and scope, until HMRC clarified their application in BN 29.
The proposed reforms in the consultation document are currently scheduled for implementation in the Finance Act 2008 giving little time for due consideration of the impact of the reforms, let alone the systems changes that may be required to comply with the proposed reforms. Neither do they take account of potential timing issues on other ongoing relevant consultations, on Property Authorised Investment Funds (PAIFs) and Funds of Alternative Investment Funds (FAIFs).

Given the scale of UK institutional investment in seeding hedge funds it would also seem practical to defer the introduction of the reforms until there is clearer direction on HMRCs taxation of foreign profits discussion document.

Finally, the recent and current legislative flux surrounding offshore funds is such that there are widespread concerns that accelerating further tax changes to the regime could prove to be harmful for the industry, particularly in view of the proposal to reduce the Capital Gains Tax rate to 18 percent. There are also EU considerations which must be borne in mind. The EU Commission Communication issued on the 10th of December 2007, emphasised the need, "to strike a proper balance between the public interest of combating abuse and the need to avoid the disproportionate restrictions on cross border activity within the EU". The consultation document, however, makes no reference to principles of EU law.

Given the issues outlined above, it is key for the hedge fund industry that any reforms implemented should take account of the fact that the tax rate differential of 22 percent would have a very significant impact on appetite for a hedge fund product on the part of UK individual investors. A more onerous approach in how reportable income should be calculated for hedge funds, by seeking to re-characterise gains as income at fund level, could result in distorting the market as between long only and certain alternative funds for tax purposes and ultimately have the effect of acting as a barrier to investing in hedge funds when the UK, as a jurisdiction, is in fact striving to introduce Funds of Alternative Investment Funds, to facilitate access to hedge funds to the retail market.

Back to Listing

Main Menu

  1. Home
  2. About
    1. Our Core Objectives
    2. AIMA's Policy Principles
    3. Meet the team
    4. AIMA Council
    5. Global Network
    6. Sponsoring Members
    7. Global Partners
    8. FAQs
    9. Opportunities at AIMA
  3. Join AIMA
    1. Benefits of Membership
    2. Membership Fees
    3. Application form
  4. Members
    1. AIMA DDQs
    2. AIMA Annual Reports
    3. AIMA Governance
    4. AIMA Logo
      1. Policy note
    5. AIMA Members' List
    6. AIMA Review of the Year
    7. Committees and Working Groups
    8. Weekly News
    9. Update Profile
  5. Investors
    1. AIMA Investor Services
    2. AIMA Members' List
    3. Investor Steering Committee
    4. Update Profile
  6. Regulation
    1. Asset Management Regulation
      1. EU Asset Management Regulation
        1. AIFMD
        2. European Capital Markets Regulation
        3. MiFID / MiFIR
        4. UCITS
        5. European Venture Capital Directive
        6. Shareholder Rights Directive
        7. European Long Term Investment Fund Regulation
        8. Loan Origination Funds
        9. Capital Raising
        10. AIFMD-Related Events
      2. US Hedge Fund Adviser Regulations
        1. Registration and Reporting
        2. Incentive-Based Compensation
        3. JOBS Act
      3. Asia Pacific Asset Management regulation
      4. Other Jurisdictions’ Asset Management Regulation
      5. Systemically Important Financial Institutions ('SIFIs')
      6. Remuneration
        1. UK
        2. United States
        3. CRD IV and CRR
        4. AIFMD
        5. MiFID
      7. Shadow Banking
      8. Volcker Rule
      9. Other
      10. Systemic Risk Reporting
      11. Dealing Commission
      12. Corporate Governance
    2. Markets Regulation
      1. Bank/Capital Regulation
        1. Capital Requirements Directive
        2. EU Bank Structural Reforms
      2. Derivatives/Clearing
        1. EMIR
        2. MiFID II / MiFIR - Derivatives
        3. MAD / MAR
        4. Dodd-Frank Act Title VII
        5. Hong Kong
        6. IOSCO
        7. Singapore
      3. High Frequency Trading
        1. ESMA Guidelines
        2. MiFID II / MiFIR - HFT
        3. MAD / MAR
        4. Flash Crash
        5. IOSCO
        6. Germany
        7. CFTC Automated Trading
      4. Insurance Regulation
        1. Solvency II
      5. Market Abuse
        1. MAD / MAR
        2. Indices as Benchmarks
      6. Position Limits
        1. MiFID II - Commodities
        2. CFTC Position Limits
      7. Resolution of Financial Institutions
        1. Europe
          1. EU Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive
          2. EU Non-Bank Recovery and Resolution
        2. CPSS-IOSCO
        3. Financial Stability Board
        4. UK
        5. USA
      8. Short Selling
        1. EU Short Selling Regulation
        2. Hong Kong Short Selling Regulation
        3. US Short Selling Regulation
        4. Short Selling Bans
      9. Securities Settlement
      10. Shadow Banking
        1. International Shadow Banking
        2. EU Shadow Banking
      11. Trading
        1. Dodd-Frank Act
        2. MiFID Portal
    3. Tax Affairs
      1. Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI)
        1. FATCA
        2. EU - AEFI
        3. OECD - Global Standard on AEFI
      2. Australia - Investment Manager Regime (IMR)
      3. Base Erosion - Profit Shifting (BEPS)
      4. FAIFs and FINROFs
      5. FIN 48 and IAS 12
      6. Financial Transaction Tax (FTT)
      7. UK Investment Management Exemption (IME)
      8. UK Offshore Funds Regime
      9. Other
    4. AIMA's Policy Principles
    5. Search
    6. Resources
      1. Guidance Notes
      2. Jurisdictional Guides
      3. Noticeboard
        1. AEOI: FATCA and other regimes
        2. AIFMD
        3. BEPS
        4. CFTC Registration and Exemptions
        5. Corporate Governance
        6. Dealing Commission
        7. Derivatives
        8. FTT
        9. High Frequency Trading
        10. MiFID / MiFIR
        11. Other Hot Asset Management Topics
        12. Other Hot Markets Topics
        13. Other Hot Tax Topics
        14. Position Limits
        15. UK Partnership Tax Review
        16. Trading
        17. Volcker Rule
      4. Hedge Fund Manager Training
      5. Quarterly Regulatory Update
      6. Webinar Programme
      7. Regulatory Compliance Association
        1. About the Regulatory Compliance Association
        2. RCA Curricula and initiatives for alternative investment firms
        3. Meet the regulators and Sr. Fellows
  7. Education
    1. Research
      1. Research
      2. Industry research
      3. Search research documents
    2. "The Case for Hedge Funds"
      1. Global Hedge Fund Industry Paper: The value of our industry
      2. The Value of the Hedge Fund Industry to Investors, Markets and the Broader Economy: Research commissioned by AIMA and KPMG
      3. The Evolution of an Industry: KPMG/AIMA Global Hedge Fund Survey
      4. Contributing to Communities: A global review of charitable and philanthropic activities by the hedge fund industry
      5. Beyond 60-40: The evolving role of hedge funds in institutional investor portfolios
      6. The Cost of Compliance: Global hedge fund survey by AIMA, MFA and KPMG
      7. Capital Markets and Economic Growth: Long-term trends and policy challenges
      8. Apples and Apples: How to better understand hedge fund performance
      9. The Extra Mile: Partnerships between hedge funds and investors
      10. Key articles by AIMA on the case for hedge funds
    3. AIMA Journal
      1. Recent issues
      2. Search AIMA Journal articles
      3. AIMA Journal Archive
    4. AIMA Guides to Sound Practices
    5. AIMA guides for institutional investors
    6. CAIA Association pages
      1. Fundamentals of Alternative Investments
    7. Regulatory Compliance Association pages
      1. About the Regulatory Compliance Association
      2. RCA Curricula and initiatives for alternative investment firms
      3. Meet the regulators and Sr. Fellows
    8. Certified Investment Fund Director programme
    9. Services to Start-up Managers
    10. Useful Websites
    11. Glossary
  8. Events
    1. AIMA Events
    2. AIMA webinars
    3. Industry events
  9. Media
    1. Press Releases & Statements
    2. AIMA's blog
    3. Media Coverage
      1. Articles by AIMA
        1. Archive
      2. AIMA in the news
      3. Video interviews
      4. Industry news
    4. Media Contact
    5. Press Materials

Sub Menu

  1. Education
    1. AIMA Journal
    2. Bibliography
    3. CAIA Designation
    4. Research
    5. Roadmap to Hedge Funds
    6. AIMA's Investor Steering Committee Paper
    7. Glossary
  2. Regulatory, Tax, Policy & Government Affairs
    1. AIMA Position Papers
    2. AIMA Responses
      1. Australian Tax Office
      2. Authority for the Financial Markets
      3. Committee of European Banking Supervisors
      4. Committee of European Securities Regulators
      5. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
      6. Dubai Financial Services Authority
      7. European Commission
      8. European Securities and Markets Authority
      9. Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority
      10. Financial Services Authority (UK)
      11. Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau
      12. Guernsey Financial Services Commission
      13. HM Revenue & Customs
      14. HM Treasury
      15. Independent Commission on Banking
      16. IOSCO
      17. Monetary Authority of Singapore
      18. Securities and Exchange Board of India
      19. Securities and Exchange Commission (USA)
      20. Securities and Futures Commission
      21. Singapore Exchange
      22. The Takeover Panel
      23. US House of Representatives / Senate
      24. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
      25. Financial Stability Oversight Council
      26. Financial Stability Board
      27. US Treasury
      28. Internal Revenue Service
      29. US Federal Reserve
      30. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA)
      31. Council of European Union
      32. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing
      33. House of Lords
    3. AIMA Summaries
      1. CESR
      2. European Commission
      3. Financial Services Authority (UK)
      4. HM Revenue & Customs
      5. HM Treasury
      6. IOSCO
      7. Securities and Exchanges Commission
      8. FSOC
      9. CFTC
    4. Guidance Notes
    5. Jurisdictional Resource
    6. AIMA Noticeboard
      1. EU Directive on Alternative Investment Fund Managers
      2. FSA Remuneration Code
      3. Short Selling
      4. US Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
      5. UK Stewardship Code
      6. Securities Law Directive
      7. EU Directive on Alternative Investment Fund Managers - Level II
      8. EU Directive on Markets in Financial Instruments (MiFID)
      9. International Financial Centres
      10. Bribery Act
      11. Market Abuse Directive
      12. MF Global
      13. FATCA
      14. FTT
      15. Other Tax Issues
    7. AIMA Regulatory Update
  3. Sound Practices
    1. Due Diligence Questionnaires
    2. Guides to Sound Practices
  4. Start-Up Service Providers
  5. Useful Websites