Executive Summary
The Joint Data Proposals
On February 8, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission jointly adopted changes to the systemic risk reporting template to be completed by registered investment advisers that advise private funds -- Form PF. The changes adopted were not siginifcantly revised from what was proposed and constitute a nearly full re-write of the sections of the form that affect all filers and large hedge fund advisers in particular. These revisions are the third set of changes in the last year to the Form PF adopted by the SEC and affect the parts of the Form that are jointly controlled by the SEC and CFTC.
The the most substantive and challenging of the changes to the form are in the following areas:
- Treatment of master feeder funds: See revised Instructions 5, 6 and 7.
- Look throughs and aggregation: See revised Instructions 7 and 8, Questions 32, 33, 35, 36 and 47 and the revised definitions that include specific look through requirements as well.
- Fund performance reporting: See Question 23.
- Counterparty and creditor disclosures for all funds other than qualifying hedge funds: See Questions 26, 27 and 28.
- Disclosure of the monthly aggregate reporting fund exposures (long and short) by sub-asset class: See Question 32.
- Currency exposure: See Question 33.
- Netted exposures: See Question 39.
- Detailed reporting regarding reference assets: See Question 40.
- Counterparty and creditor disclosures for qualifying hedge funds: See Questions 41, 42, 43 and 44.
- Monthly and quarterly performance reporting: See Question 49.
Filers will have 365 following the publication of the adopting release in the Federal Register to update their reporting systems in line with the altered reporting requirements.
A full summary of the new requirements and the differences between what was proposed and what was ultimately adopted can be accessed by AIMA members here.
Note: On September 17, 2025, the SEC and CFTC further extended the effective/compliance date for the joint data changes to October 1, 2026.
April 2026 Streamlining Proposal
On April 20, 2026, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) jointly published a proposed rulemaking to amend Form PF, with the aim of streamlining private fund systemic risk reporting requirements (the “Proposed Requirements”). Terms used in this summary have the meanings ascribed to them in the proposed Form PF.
The Proposed Requirements include the following key changes to Form PF:
Thresholds
- Increasing the filing threshold for all filers from $150 million to $1 billion in private fund asset under management. (General Instruction 1)
- Raising the reporting threshold for large hedge fund advisers from $1.5 billion to $10 billion in hedge fund assets under management. (General Instruction 3)
Reporting obligations for all filers
- Eliminating the requirement to separately report feeder funds with only de minimis holdings other than its investment in a single master fund, U.S. Treasury bills and/or cash and cash equivalents. (General Instruction 6)
- Removing certain prescriptive “look-through” requirements, allowing advisers to report indirect exposures using reasonable estimates aligned with internal methodologies and service provider conventions. (General Instructions 7 and 8 and conforming amendments to certain questions and definitions)
- Narrowing the scope of the types of trading vehicles that must be identified. (Question 9 and General Instruction 7)
- Eliminating certain performance volatility reporting requirements, including aggregated calculated values, monthly annualized return volatility and data derived from daily rates of return. (Question 23(c) and General Instruction 15)
- Removing the requirement to report the value of positions at the end of the reporting period. (Questions 29 and 30)
Reporting obligations for large hedge fund advisers
- Eliminating one of the required reporting methods for monthly adjusted exposures of qualifying hedge funds. (Question 32)
- Eliminating the requirement for large hedge fund advisers to report monthly turnover by asset class. (Question 34)
- Allowing filers to elect to use fewer digits of North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes when reporting industry exposure. (Question 36)
- Eliminating reporting on monthly concentrated exposures to reference assets, instead incorporating a streamlined exposure measure into the existing extraordinary loss current reporting trigger. (Questions 39 and 40, and Section 5, Item B)
- Removing the consolidated counterparty exposure table, instead allowing large hedge fund advisers to report simplified exposure data in Question 26, disclose the value of the reporting fund’s borrowings and types of creditors in Question 18, disclose borrowings to significant counterparties in Questions 42 and 43, and categorize significant borrowing entries within Question 42. (Questions 41 and 42, and conforming amendments to Questions 18, 26, 43, and the Glossary of Terms)
- Eliminating the requirement to report the amount of collateral posted by counterparties that may be or has been rehypothecated. (Question 45)
- Modifying current reporting triggers by removing the requirement to report “as soon as practicable”. (Section 5)
Current reporting obligations for large hedge fund advisers
- Deleting reporting requirements related to margin defaults or failures to meet calls for margin, collateral, or equivalents within 72 hours. (Section 5, Item D)
- Changing the requirement to report certain operational events involving significant disruptions to a fund’s critical operations within 72 hours by removing the obligation to report “as promptly as practicable” and by amending the definition of “critical operations” to remove the trigger prong regarding events related the operation of the reporting fund in accordance with the Federal securities laws and regulations. (Section 5, Item G and the Glossary of Terms)
- Removing the requirement to report when a fund is unable to meet redemption requests within 72 hours, while retaining reporting for prolonged redemption suspensions. (Section 5, Item I)
Current reporting obligations for large private equity fund advisers
- Eliminate quarterly event reporting requirements for private equity fund advisers. (Section 6 and cross references in General Instructions 1, 3 and 12)
The Proposed Requirements also include a variety of other small corrections and revisions.
In addition to proposing the changes above, the SEC and CFTC have posed a series of questions regarding whether and how to modify the information that advisers report regarding private credit funds.
The Proposed Requirements include a 12-month transition period beginning once any new requirements are adopted, but the fate of the requirements due to be complied with as of October 1, 2026 remains an open question.
Comments are due on or before June 23, 2026.
If there are questions regarding these new requirements, please contact Jennifer Wood.
-
Jennifer Wood
Managing Director, Global Head of Asset Management Regulation & Sound Practices
Timeline
| Comments due on SEC/CFTC's further Form PF proposal | June 23, 2026 | |
| SEC/CFTC propose further amendments to Form PF | April 20, 2026 | |
| Third (and current) extended compliance date for joint data requirements | October 1, 2026 | |
| Second extended compliance date for joint data requirements | October 1, 2025 | |
| Third extension of compliance date for joint data requirements | September 17, 2025 | |
| AIMA Concept Paper: Reimaging Systemic Risk Reporting in Relation to Hedge Funds | August 11,2025 | |
| Letter to SEC and CFTC requesting reconsideration of pending requiements and extension | August 6, 2025 | |
| First extended compliance date for joint data requirements | June 12, 2025 | |
| Second extension of compliance date for joint data requirements | June 11, 2025 | |
| Letter to SEC requesting extension of compliance date | June 10, 2025 | |
| Effective Date (and previously the compliance date as well) | March 12, 2025 | |
| AIMA letter to Acting Chair Uyeda | March 10, 2025 | |
| SEC announces extension of compliance date | January 29, 2025 | |
| AIMA letter to Acting Chair Uyeda requesting extension of compliance date | January 22, 2025 | |
| SEC staff publishes updated Form PF FAQs | December 20, 2024 | |
| AIMA joins other trades in submitting a letter to the SEC and CFTC requesting an extension of the March 12 compliance date |
December 13, 2024 | |
| AIMA submits letter to SEC Staff concerning availability of old Form PF past March 12, 2025 | October 3, 2025 | |
| Effective/Compliance Date for Section 3 changes and May 2023 changes other than Sections 5 & 6 |
June 11, 2024 | |
| Federal Register publication date for joint data requirements | March 12, 2024 | |
| Final joint data reporting requirements published | February 8, 2024 | |
| Effective/Compliance Date for Event Reporting Sections 5 & 6 | December 11, 2023 | |
| Launch of Event Reporting Implementation Guide | September 13, 2023 | |
| Final Section 3 reporting requirements for large liquidity fund advisers published | July 12, 2023 | |
| Federal Register version of event reporting requirements published | June 12, 2023 | |
| Final event reporting requirements published | May 3, 2023 | |
| Comment deadline for joint data proposal | October 11, 2022 | |
| AIMA/ACC response to joint data proposal filed | October 11, 2022 | |
| Joint trades request for extension of joint data proposal submitted | September 14, 2022 | |
| AIMA/ACC summary of joint data proposal | August 23, 2022 | |
| Joint data proposal published by SEC/CFTC | August 10, 2022 | |
| Comment deadline for current reporting proposal | March 21, 2022 | |
| AIMA/ACC response to current reporting proposal filed | March 21, 2022 | |
| Joint trades request for extension of current reporting proposal submitted | March 1, 2022 | |
| AIMA/ACC summary of current reporting proposal | February 4, 2022 | |
| Current reporting proposal published by SEC (which included changes affecting large liquiidty fund advisers) |
January 26, 2022 |
Event Reporting Q&A
AIMA has informally discussed a number of specific questions with the SEC staff and received non-binding, informal responses from them regarding their expectations. Logged in members should see those questions and a paraphrase of the indicative answers we received below. If there are questions, please contact Jennifer Wood ([email protected]).
