Sponsor

This matrix has been developed by AIMA’s Sponsoring Partner, Allen & Overy Luxembourg.
To the extent permitted by law, none of AIMA, Allen & Overy, or any of their respective partners, employees, agents, service providers or professional advisors assumes any liability or responsibility for, nor owes any duty of care for any consequences of, any person accessing, using, acting or refraining to act in reliance on the information contained in this matrix.
Director requirements
What available structures are there?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Common Fund (FCP) Investment company with variable capital (SICAV) Investment company with fixed capital (SICAF) |
Common Fund (FCP) Investment company with variable capital (SICAV) Investment company with fixed capital (SICAF) |
Common Fund (FCP) Investment company with variable capital (SICAV) Investment company with fixed capital (SICAF) |
Investment company with variable capital Investment company with fixed capital |
Common Fund (FCP) (except for RAIFs investing in risk capital) Investment company with variable capital (SICAV) Investment copmany with fixed capital (SICAF) |
N/A |
*of main corporate forms of investment companies
Is a director a direct or indirect member of the governing body? (i.e., board of directors, trustees, general partner, managing member, other)?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
In a common Fund, decisions relating to the day-to-day management are taken by the management company. In an investment company, decisions relating to the day-to-day management are taken by the Board of directors/managers, or the general partner. |
In a common Fund, decisions relating to the day-to-day management are taken by the management company. In an investment company, decisions relating to the day-to-day management are taken by the Board of directors/managers, or the general partner. |
In a common Fund, decisions relating to the day-to-day management are taken by the management company. In an investment company, decisions relating to the day-to-day management are taken by the Board of directors/managers, or the general partner. |
In an investment company, decisions relating to the day-to-day management are taken by the board of directors/managers or the general partner. |
In a common Fund, decisions relating to the day-to-day management are taken by the management company. In an investment company, decisions relating to the day-to-day management are taken by the Board of directors/managers or the general partner. |
Decisions relating to the day-to-day management are taken by the general partner |
Is there an applicable statutory regime?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part I of Law of 17 December 2010 relating to undertakings for collective investment. |
Part II of Law of 17 December 2010 relating to undertakings for collective investment. | Law of 13 February 2007 relating to specialised investment Funds. | Law of 15 June 2004 relating to the investment company in risk capital. | Law of 23 July 2016 on reserved alternative investment Funds. | Law of 10 August 1915 on commercial companies. |
Is there an applicable corporate governance code or guidance?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALFI Code of Conduct for Luxembourg Investment Funds; |
ALFI Code of Conduct for Luxembourg Investment Funds; ALFI Code of Conduct guidance, May 2017; ALFI Code of Conduct guidance, October 2017. |
ALFI Code of Conduct for Luxembourg Investment Funds; ALFI Code of Conduct guidance, May 2017; ALFI Code of Conduct guidance, October 2017. |
ALFI Code of Conduct for Luxembourg Investment Funds; ALFI Code of Conduct guidance, May 2017; ALFI Code of Conduct guidance, October 2017. |
ALFI Code of Conduct for Luxembourg Investment Funds; ALFI Code of Conduct guidance, May 2017; ALFI Code of Conduct guidance, October 2017. |
ALFI Code of Conduct for Luxembourg Investment Funds; ALFI Code of Conduct guidance, May 2017; ALFI Code of Conduct guidance, October 2017. |
What is the (minimum) board composition?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public limited company: (1) One-tier: 3 directors, (2) Two-tier: 2 members of management board, 3 members of supervisory Board; |
Public limited company: (1) One-tier: 3 directors, (2) Two-tier: 2 members of management board, 3 members of supervisory Board; Private limited liability company: 3 managers; Partnership limited by shares: 3 managers or a general partner (whose board is composed of at least 3 members); Special limited partnership: 3 managers or a general partner (whose board is composed of at least 3 members); Common limited partnership: 3 managers or a general partner (whose board is composed of at least 3 members); Cooperative company organised as a public limited company: 3 directors. |
Public limited company: (1) One-tier: 3 directors, (2) Two-tier: 2 members of management board, 3 members of supervisory Board; Private limited liability company: 3 managers; Partnership limited by shares: 3 managers or a general partner (whose board is composed of at least 3 members); Special limited partnership: 3 managers or a general partner (whose board is composed of at least 3 members); Common limited partnership: 3 managers or a general partner (whose board is composed of at least 3 members); Cooperative company organised as a public limited company: 3 directors. |
Public limited company: (1) One-tier: 3 directors, (2) Two-tier: 2 members of management board, 3 members of supervisory Board; Private limited liability company: 3 managers; Partnership limited by shares: 3 managers or a general partner (whose board is composed of at least 3 members); Special limited partnership: 3 managers or a general partner (whose board is composed of at least 3 members); Common limited partnership: 3 managers or a general partner (whose board is composed of at least 3 members); Cooperative company organised as a public limited company: 3 directors. |
Public limited company: (1) One-tier: 3 directors, (2) Two-tier: 2 members of management board, 3 members of supervisory Board; Private limited liability company: 3 managers; Partnership limited by shares: 3 managers or a general partner (whose board is composed of at least 3 members); Special limited partnership: 3 managers or a general partner (whose board is composed of at least 3 members); Common limited partnership: 3 managers or a general partner (whose board is composed of at least 3 members); Cooperative company organised as a public limited company: 3 directors. |
Special limited partnership (SCSp): 3 managers or a general partner (whose board is composed of at least 3 members) Common limited partnerhsip (SCS): 3 managers or a general partner (whose board is composed of at least 3 members) |
Are independent directors required? If so, how is independence defined?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
In principle there are no requirements with respect to the number of independent directors, however in accordance with the ALFI code of Conduct, Guidance on Director Independence, October 2017 it is recommended to consider the inclusion in the management board of one or more members that are, in the opinion of the management board, independent. |
In principle there are no requirements with respect to the number of independent directors, however in accordance with the ALFI code of Conduct, Guidance on Director Independence, October 2017 it is recommended to consider the inclusion in the management board of one or more members that are, in the opinion of the management board, independent. There is no definition of "independence", however the key guidance is derived from the EU Recommendation of 15 February 2005 on the role of Non-Executive directors of listed companies, which includes in its Annex II a list of objective criteria to consider when assessing independence. The definition has been incorporated into "The X Principles of Corporate Governance of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange", where it is set out in “Appendix D: Independence Criteria". In the context of the Fund industry, such criteria can largely be applied as they stand, but in order to ensure substance over form a wider concept of “the company” needs to be applied to encompass the sponsor group and its employees. Reference to these criteria may assist boards in their consideration of criteria to adopt for assessing whether board members are independent. The EU Recommendation views independence primarily through the lens of absence of any material conflict of interest. |
In principle there are no requirements with respect to the number of independent directors, however in accordance with the ALFI code of Conduct, Guidance on Director Independence, October 2017 it is recommended to consider the inclusion in the management board of one or more members that are, in the opinion of the management board, independent. There is no definition of "independence", however the key guidance is derived from the EU Recommendation of 15 February 2005 on the role of Non-Executive directors of listed companies, which includes in its Annex II a list of objective criteria to consider when assessing independence. The definition has been incorporated into "The X Principles of Corporate Governance of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange", where it is set out in “Appendix D: Independence Criteria". In the context of the Fund industry, such criteria can largely be applied as they stand, but in order to ensure substance over form a wider concept of “the company” needs to be applied to encompass the sponsor group and its employees. Reference to these criteria may assist boards in their consideration of criteria to adopt for assessing whether board members are independent. The EU Recommendation views independence primarily through the lens of absence of any material conflict of interest. |
In principle there are no requirements with respect to the number of independent directors, however in accordance with the ALFI code of Conduct, Guidance on Director Independence, October 2017 it is recommended to consider the inclusion in the management board of one or more members that are, in the opinion of the management board, independent. There is no definition of "independence", however the key guidance is derived from the EU Recommendation of 15 February 2005 on the role of Non-Executive directors of listed companies, which includes in its Annex II a list of objective criteria to consider when assessing independence. The definition has been incorporated into "The X Principles of Corporate Governance of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange", where it is set out in “Appendix D: Independence Criteria". In the context of the Fund industry, such criteria can largely be applied as they stand, but in order to ensure substance over form a wider concept of “the company” needs to be applied to encompass the sponsor group and its employees. Reference to these criteria may assist boards in their consideration of criteria to adopt for assessing whether board members are independent. The EU Recommendation views independence primarily through the lens of absence of any material conflict of interest. |
In principle there are no requirements with respect to the number of independent directors, however in accordance with the ALFI code of Conduct, Guidance on Director Independence, October 2017 it is recommended to consider the inclusion in the management board of one or more members that are, in the opinion of the management board, independent. There is no definition of "independence", however the key guidance is derived from the EU Recommendation of 15 February 2005 on the role of Non-Executive directors of listed companies, which includes in its Annex II a list of objective criteria to consider when assessing independence. The definition has been incorporated into "The X Principles of Corporate Governance of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange", where it is set out in “Appendix D: Independence Criteria". In the context of the Fund industry, such criteria can largely be applied as they stand, but in order to ensure substance over form a wider concept of “the company” needs to be applied to encompass the sponsor group and its employees. Reference to these criteria may assist boards in their consideration of criteria to adopt for assessing whether board members are independent. The EU Recommendation views independence primarily through the lens of absence of any material conflict of interest. |
In principle there are no requirements with respect to the number of independent directors, however in accordance with the ALFI code of Conduct, Guidance on Director Independence, October 2017 it is recommended to consider the inclusion in the management board of one or more members that are, in the opinion of the management board, independent. There is no definition of "independence", however the key guidance is derived from the EU Recommendation of 15 February 2005 on the role of Non-Executive directors of listed companies, which includes in its Annex II a list of objective criteria to consider when assessing independence. The definition has been incorporated into "The X Principles of Corporate Governance of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange", where it is set out in “Appendix D: Independence Criteria". In the context of the Fund industry, such criteria can largely be applied as they stand, but in order to ensure substance over form a wider concept of “the company” needs to be applied to encompass the sponsor group and its employees. Reference to these criteria may assist boards in their consideration of criteria to adopt for assessing whether board members are independent. The EU Recommendation views independence primarily through the lens of absence of any material conflict of interest. |
Do directors require any qualifications?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Members of the board must be of sufficiently good repute and have sufficient experience for performing their functions.** |
Members of the board must be of sufficiently good repute and have sufficient experience for performing their functions.** | Members of the board must be of sufficiently good repute and have sufficient experience for performing their functions.** | Members of the board must be of sufficiently good repute and have sufficient experience for performing their functions.** | N/A** | N/A |
**We note that for AML/KYC purposes all regulated investment Funds and RAIFs are required to appoint one person at management level (i.e., the managing body of the relevant entity) responsible for compliance with AML/CFT obligations (referred to as an RR, from the French "responsable du respect"). The RR may also be the managing body collectively. There is in principle no residency requirement, however the RR (i) is expected to be contactable at any time by the competent Luxembourg AML/CFT authorities), and (ii) must have sufficient knowledge of the Luxembourg AML/CFT legal framework and be able to demonstrate this (e.g., by way of training).
What are the specific rules around board meetings (frequency/location)?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frequency of Board meetings will differ in accordance with the specific needs |
Frequency of Board meetings will differ in accordance with the specific needs and complexity of each investment Fund or management company (in case of a common Fund), as well as current business needs and conditions (however, board meetings would typically be held at least once a year) |
Frequency of Board meetings will differ in accordance with the specific needs and complexity of each investment Fund or management company (in case of a common Fund), as well as current business needs and conditions (however, board meetings would typically be held at least once a year) |
Frequency of Board meetings will differ in accordance with the specific needs and complexity of each investment Fund or management company (in case of a common Fund), as well as current business needs and conditions (however, board meetings would typically be held at least once a year) |
Frequency of Board meetings will differ in accordance with the specific needs and complexity of each investment Fund or management company (in case of a common Fund), as well as current business needs and conditions (however, board meetings would typically be held at least once a year) |
Frequency of Board meetings will differ in accordance with the specific needs and complexity of each investment Fund or management company (in case of a common Fund), as well as current business needs and conditions (however, board meetings would typically be held at least once a year) |
Are there any resident director requirements?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
There are in principle no residency (or nationality) requirements for the directors/managers, however the CSSF generally expects to see at least one Luxembourg based director/manager** |
There are in principle no residency (or nationality) requirements for the directors/managers, however the CSSF generally expects to see at least one Luxembourg based director/manager** | There are in principle no residency (or nationality) requirements for the directors/managers, however the CSSF generally expects to see at least one Luxembourg based director/manager** | There are in principle no residency (or nationality) requirements for the directors/managers, however the CSSF generally expects to see at least one Luxembourg based director/manager** | There are in principle no residency (or nationality) requirements for the directors/managers.** | There are in principle no residency (or nationality) requirements for the directors/managers.** |
**We note that for AML/KYC purposes all regulated investment Funds and RAIFs are required to appoint one person at management level (i.e., the managing body of the relevant entity) responsible for compliance with AML/CFT obligations (referred to as an RR, from the French "responsable du respect"). The RR may also be the managing body collectively. There is in principle no residency requirement, however the RR (i) is expected to be contactable at any time by the competent Luxembourg AML/CFT authorities), and (ii) must have sufficient knowledge of the Luxembourg AML/CFT legal framework and be able to demonstrate this (e.g., by way of training).
What are the registration requirements?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
There are no registration requirements for directors/managers, however a general partner as a legal person must be incorporated and registered with the Luxembourg trade and companies register (RCS) |
There are no registration requirements for directors/managers, however a general partner as a legal person must be incorporated and registered with the Luxembourg trade and companies register (RCS) | There are no registration requirements for directors/managers, however a general partner as a legal person must be incorporated and registered with the Luxembourg trade and companies register (RCS) | There are no registration requirements for directors/managers, however a general partner as a legal person must be incorporated and registered with the Luxembourg trade and companies register (RCS) | There are no registration requirements for directors/managers, however a general partner as a legal person must be incorporated and registered with the Luxembourg trade and companies register (RCS) | There are no registration requirements for directors/managers, however a general partner as a legal person must be incorporated and registered with the Luxembourg trade and companies register (RCS) |
Is there a registration fee payable?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
There are no registration fees for directors/managers |
There are no registration fees for directors/managers | There are no registration fees for directors/managers | There are no registration fees for directors/managers | There are no registration fees for directors/managers | There are no registration fees for directors/managers |
What is the typical range of fees paid to non-executive directors?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unable to comment. |
Unable to comment. | Unable to comment. | Unable to comment. | Unable to comment. | Unable to comment. |
Are corporate directors allowed?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes. |
Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. |
Are there any fitness and propriety requirements?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Members of the Board must be of sufficiently good repute and have sufficient experience for performing their functions.** |
Members of the Board must be of sufficiently good repute and have sufficient experience for performing their functions.** | Members of the Board must be of sufficiently good repute and have sufficient experience for performing their functions.** | Members of the Board must be of sufficiently good repute and have sufficient experience for performing their functions.** | N/A | N/A |
Are there any limitations on the amount of directorships held?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The members of the Board are expected to understand the activities of the Fund and devote sufficient time to their role - there is an unofficial limit on number of directorship mandates (20) and total hours p.a. (1,920). |
The members of the Board are expected to understand the activities of the Fund and devote sufficient time to their role - there is an unofficial limit on number of directorship mandates (20) and total hours p.a. (1,920). | The members of the Board are expected to understand the activities of the Fund and devote sufficient time to their role - there is an unofficial limit on number of directorship mandates (20) and total hours p.a. (1,920). | The members of the Board are expected to understand the activities of the Fund and devote sufficient time to their role - there is an unofficial limit on number of directorship mandates (20) and total hours p.a. (1,920). | No | No |
Are decisions of the governing body permitted to be taken through committee action?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Board may create dedicated committees for the fulfillment of its duties; this does not diminish in any way the Board's collective responsibility. |
The Board may create dedicated committees for the fulfillment of its duties; this does not diminish in any way the Board's collective responsibility. | The Board may create dedicated committees for the fulfillment of its duties; this does not diminish in any way the Board's collective responsibility. | The Board may create dedicated committees for the fulfillment of its duties; this does not diminish in any way the Board's collective responsibility. | The Board may create dedicated committees for the fulfillment of its duties; this does not diminish in any way the Board's collective responsibility. | The Board may create dedicated committees for the fulfillment of its duties; this does not diminish in any way the Board's collective responsibility. |
Are standing committees required?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. |
No. | No. | No. | No. | No. |
Are ad hoc committees permitted?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes. |
Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. |
Are there any specific tax issues that need to be considered?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N/A |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
What are the recordkeeping requirements?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EU Fourth AML Directive - records to be kept for 5 years. |
EU Fourth AML Directive - records to be kept for 5 years. | EU Fourth AML Directive - records to be kept for 5 years. | EU Fourth AML Directive - records to be kept for 5 years. | EU Fourth AML Directive - records to be kept for 5 years. | EU Fourth AML Directive - records to be kept for 5 years. |
Is delegation/outsourcing to service providers allowed?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes |
Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Other?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N/A |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Organisational requirements
What are the key documents required for formation? ***
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
− Application form to set up a UCI available on the eDesk portal of the CSSF containing a detailed overview of the vehicle to be set up and of its governing bodies (specific application documents for directors shall be provided in order to evidence their experience and good standing); |
− Application form to set up a UCI available on the eDesk portal of the CSSF containing a detailed overview of the vehicle to be set up and of its governing bodies (specific application documents for directors shall be provided in order to evidence their experience and good standing); − Draft constitutional documents: management regulations (common Funds) or articles of incorporation (investment companies in the corporate form) or partnership agreement (if common or special limited partnership); − Draft version of the prospectus / offering memorandum; − Draft key investor information (KII) for UCITS; − Draft service provider contracts (depositary, central administration, domiciliation agent, management company/AIFM agreement, investment advisory, etc.); − Written confirmation from auditor; − AML/CFT market entry form. |
− Application form to set up a UCI available on the eDesk portal of the CSSF containing a detailed overview of the vehicle to be set up and of its governing bodies (specific application documents for directors shall be provided in order to evidence their experience and good standing); − Draft constitutional documents: management regulations (common Funds) or articles of incorporation (investment companies in the corporate form) or partnership agreement (if common or special limited partnership); − Draft version of the prospectus / offering memorandum; − Draft key investor information (KII) for UCITS; − Draft service provider contracts (depositary, central administration, domiciliation agent, management company/AIFM agreement, investment advisory, etc.); − Written confirmation from auditor; − AML/CFT market entry form. |
− Application form to set up a UCI available on the eDesk portal of the CSSF containing a detailed overview of the vehicle to be set up and of its governing bodies (specific application documents for directors shall be provided in order to evidence their experience and good standing); − Draft constitutional documents: management regulations (common Funds) or articles of incorporation (investment companies in the corporate form) or partnership agreement (if common or special limited partnership); − Draft version of the prospectus / offering memorandum; − Draft key investor information (KII) for UCITS; − Draft service provider contracts (depositary, central administration, domiciliation agent, management company/AIFM agreement, investment advisory, etc.); − Written confirmation from auditor; − AML/CFT market entry form. |
No CSSF authorisation required | No CSSF authorisation required |
***Documents to be provided for all types of regulated vehicles.
What is the formation process?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) Determination of the key features of the investment vehicle; (2) filing of the application file with the CSSF via eDesk; (3) CSSF formal approval; (4) incorporation/ establishment and launch; and (5) first closing. |
(1) Determination of the key features of the investment vehicle; (2) filing of the application file with the CSSF via eDesk; (3) CSSF formal approval; (4) incorporation/ establishment and launch; and (5) first closing. | (1) Determination of the key features of the investment vehicle; (2) filing of the application file with the CSSF via eDesk; (3) CSSF formal approval; (4) incorporation/ establishment and launch; and (5) first closing. | (1) Determination of the key features of the investment vehicle; (2) filing of the application file with the CSSF via eDesk; (3) CSSF formal approval; (4) incorporation/ establishment and launch; and (5) first closing. | (1) Determination of the key features of the investment vehicle; (2) Incorporation/ establishment and launch; and (3) first closing | (1) Determination of the key features of the investment vehicle; (2) Incorporation/ establishment and launch; and (3) first closing |
What is the fee for formation/establishment?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Review of intial application: |
Review of intial application: - EUR 4,000 for a standalone structure - EUR 8,000 for an umbrella structure (this figure may raise to EUR 15,000 for a self-managed structure regardless of sub-Funds) |
Review of intial application: - EUR 4,000 for a standalone structure - EUR 8,000 for an umbrella structure (this figure may raise to EUR 15,000 for a self-managed structure regardless of sub-Funds) |
Review of intial application: - EUR 4,000 for a standalone structure - EUR 8,000 for an umbrella structure (this figure may raise to EUR 15,000 for a self-managed structure regardless of sub-Funds) |
Depending on the corporate structure chosen, costs may imply notary fees and/or costs linked to more complex structures. | Depending on the corporate structure chosen, costs may imply notary fees and/or costs linked to more complex structures. |
What is the process for amending key documents?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
− Initial submission of the request for approval of the amendments, together with the necessary documents; |
− Initial submission of the request for approval of the amendments, together with the necessary documents; − Acknowledgement of receipt of the amendments file by the CSSF; − Transmission of comments and possible further requests of information after initial examination by the CSSF; − Completion of examination phase; − Submission of final version of required documents; − Record of the amendments after entry into force and issuance by the CSSF of an official letter. |
− Initial submission of the request for approval of the amendments, together with the necessary documents; − Acknowledgement of receipt of the amendments file by the CSSF; − Transmission of comments and possible further requests of information after initial examination by the CSSF; − Completion of examination phase; − Submission of final version of required documents; − Record of the amendments after entry into force and issuance by the CSSF of an official letter. |
− Initial submission of the request for approval of the amendments, together with the necessary documents; − Acknowledgement of receipt of the amendments file by the CSSF; − Transmission of comments and possible further requests of information after initial examination by the CSSF; − Completion of examination phase; − Submission of final version of required documents; − Record of the amendments after entry into force and issuance by the CSSF of an official letter. |
No CSSF authorisation required | No CSSF authorisation required |
Are there any required agents/annual fees?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Service provider fees depend on the structure and operational model of the investment vehicle. They can range from limited amounts (where most tasks are performed internally) to high amounts (where investment vehicles require special expertise and outsourcing). Typical servce provider costs would consist of: |
Service provider fees depend on the structure and operational model of the investment vehicle. They can range from limited amounts (where most tasks are performed internally) to high amounts (where investment vehicles require special expertise and outsourcing). Typical servce provider costs would consist of: − Management company/AIFM costs (unless the investment Fund is self-managed); − Depositary costs; − Central administration costs; − Auditor costs. Fees for other (not mandatorily required) service providers include; (i) legal and tax advisor costs; (ii) investment management/advisory costs; (iii) independent evaluator costs; (iv) prime brokerage costs, etc. |
Service provider fees depend on the structure and operational model of the investment vehicle. They can range from limited amounts (where most tasks are performed internally) to high amounts (where investment vehicles require special expertise and outsourcing). Typical servce provider costs would consist of: − Management company/AIFM costs (unless the investment Fund is self-managed); − Depositary costs; − Central administration costs; − Auditor costs. Fees for other (not mandatorily required) service providers include; (i) legal and tax advisor costs; (ii) investment management/advisory costs; (iii) independent evaluator costs; (iv) prime brokerage costs, etc. |
Service provider fees depend on the structure and operational model of the investment vehicle. They can range from limited amounts (where most tasks are performed internally) to high amounts (where investment vehicles require special expertise and outsourcing). Typical servce provider costs would consist of: − Management company/AIFM costs (unless the investment Fund is self-managed); − Depositary costs; − Central administration costs; − Auditor costs. Fees for other (not mandatorily required) service providers include; (i) legal and tax advisor costs; (ii) investment management/advisory costs; (iii) independent evaluator costs; (iv) prime brokerage costs, etc. |
Service provider fees depend on the structure and operational model of the investment vehicle. They can range from limited amounts (where most tasks are performed internally) to high amounts (where investment vehicles require special expertise and outsourcing). Typical servce provider costs would consist of: − Management company/AIFM costs (unless the investment Fund is self-managed); − Depositary costs; − Central administration costs; − Auditor costs. Fees for other (not mandatorily required) service providers include; (i) legal and tax advisor costs; (ii) investment management/advisory costs; (iii) independent evaluator costs; (iv) prime brokerage costs, etc. |
Service provider fees depend on the structure and operational model of the investment vehicle. They can range from limited amounts (where most tasks are performed internally) to high amounts (where investment vehicles require special expertise and outsourcing). Typical servce provider costs would consist of: − Management company/AIFM costs (unless the investment Fund is self-managed); − Depositary costs; − Central administration costs; − Auditor costs. Fees for other (not mandatorily required) service providers include; (i) legal and tax advisor costs; (ii) investment management/advisory costs; (iii) independent evaluator costs; (iv) prime brokerage costs, etc. |
What is the type of ownership interest (e.g., shares, units, non-unitised interests, other)?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shares (for investment companies in the corporate form); |
Shares (for investment companies in the corporate form); Units (for common Funds); Limited partnership interests (for common and special limited partnerships). |
Shares (for investment companies in the corporate form); Units (for common Funds); Limited partnership interests (for common and special limited partnerships). |
Shares (for investment companies in the corporate form); Units (for common Funds); Limited partnership interests (for common and special limited partnerships). |
Shares (for investment companies in the corporate form); Units (for common Funds); Limited partnership interests (for common and special limited partnerships). |
Shares (for investment companies in the corporate form); Units (for common Funds); Limited partnership interests (for common and special limited partnerships). |
Are there any specific ownership rules (i.e., limits if any on numbers or types of interest holders, limits on being used as a master Fund or feeder Fund, etc)?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
− No limit of maximum number of shareholders or unitholders; |
− No limit of maximum number of shareholders or unitholders;**** − No minimum number of shareholders or unitholders; − No minimum investment by a shareholder or unitholder. |
− No limit of maximum number of shareholders or unitholders;**** − No minimum number of shareholders or unitholders; − Minimum investment of EUR 125,000 (less if certification from a credit institution, an investment firm or a management company on investor's expertise). |
− No limit of maximum number of shareholders or unitholders;**** − No minimum number of shareholders or unitholders; − Minimum investment of EUR 125,000 (less if certification from a credit institution, an investment firm or a management company on investor's expertise). |
− No limit of maximum number of shareholders or unitholders;**** − No minimum number of shareholders or unitholders; − Minimum investment of EUR 125,000 (less if certification from a credit institution, an investment firm or a management company on investor's expertise). |
− No minimum number of shareholders or unitholders; - Must qualify as professional investor within the meaning of Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II). |
What are the capital contributions needed to form the entity?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCP, SICA/F: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached no later then 6 months following the authorisation by the CSSF; |
FCP, SICA/F: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached no later then 6 months following the authorisation by the CSSF; Self managed SICAV/F: EUR 300,000 at the date of authorisation and EUR 1,250,000 within 6 months following its authorisation. |
EUR 1,250,000 to be reached no later than 12 months following the autorisation by the CSSF. | EUR 1,000,000 to be reached no later than 12 months following the authorisation by the CSSF. | FCP: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached within 12 months from the entry into force of the management regulations; SICAV: EUR 1,250,000 to be reached within 12 months from the incorporation of the SICAV. |
No minimum capital requirement. |
Are founder shares or seed capital shares permitted?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes. |
Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. |
Are sub-Funds allowed?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes. |
Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | No. |
If 'yes' to the previous question, what is the strength of the legal liability separation between the sub-Funds?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Full legal segregation of assets and liabilities between sub-Funds. |
Full legal segregation of assets and liabilities between sub-Funds. | Full legal segregation of assets and liabilities between sub-Funds. | Full legal segregation of assets and liabilities between sub-Funds. | Full legal segregation of assets and liabilities between sub-Funds. | N/A |
Are multiple classes of interests allowed?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes, no limitation and possibility to design and distinguish each share class with respect to applicable fee structures, rights to distribution of dividends, etc. |
Yes, no limitation and possibility to design and distinguish each share class with respect to applicable fee structures, rights to distribution of dividends, etc. | Yes, no limitation and possibility to design and distinguish each share class with respect to applicable fee structures, rights to distribution of dividends, etc. | Yes, no limitation and possibility to design and distinguish each share class with respect to applicable fee structures, rights to distribution of dividends, etc. | Yes, no limitation and possibility to design and distinguish each share class with respect to applicable fee structures, rights to distribution of dividends, etc. | Yes, no limitation and possibility to design and distinguish each share class with respect to applicable fee structures, rights to distribution of dividends, etc. |
Are owners personally liable?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liability of unitholders limited to their contribution (for common Funds); |
Liability of unitholders limited to their contribution (for common Funds); Liability of shareholders limited to their contribution (for investment companies in the corporate form); General partner(s) is/are jointly and severally liable for the partnership's commitments and limited partner(s) is/are not liable beyond their contribution (for investment companies in the form of common limited partnership and special limited partnership). |
Liability of unitholders limited to their contribution (for common Funds); Liability of shareholders limited to their contribution (for investment companies in the corporate form); General partner(s) is/are jointly and severally liable for the partnership's commitments and limited partner(s) is/are not liable beyond their contribution (for investment companies in the form of common limited partnership and special limited partnership). |
Liability of unitholders limited to their contribution (for common Funds); Liability of shareholders limited to their contribution (for investment companies in the corporate form); General partner(s) is/are jointly and severally liable for the partnership's commitments and limited partner(s) is/are not liable beyond their contribution (for investment companies in the form of common limited partnership and special limited partnership). |
Liability of unitholders limited to their contribution (for common Funds); Liability of shareholders limited to their contribution (for investment companies in the corporate form); General partner(s) is/are jointly and severally liable for the partnership's commitments and limited partner(s) is/are not liable beyond their contribution (for investment companies in the form of common limited partnership and special limited partnership). |
General partner(s) is/are jointly and severally liable for the partnership's commitments and limited partner(s) is/are not liable beyond their contribution (for investment companies in the form of common limited partnership and special limited partnership). |
In what circumstances could directors be liable to shareholders for their actions?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A civil liability claim against directors of a company can be made inter alia by the company and one or several shareholders of the company holding 10% of the securities entitled to vote at the General Meeting that resolved on the quitus given to the director whose liability is sought (available only to shareholders of a public limited liability company) in case of (i) Misconduct of management, or (ii) Violation of the Law of 10 August 1915 on commercial companies, as amended (the Companies Act) or the Articles. The director’s liability for misconduct of management towards the company originates from the contractual relationship between the director and the company and is only applicable to members of the management body contractually mandated by the company, as opposed to de facto directors, who lack the contractual link. Directors who form part of the management body of the company are jointly and severally liable, towards both the company and third parties, for losses resulting from the violation of the Companies Act and the articles of association of a company (the Articles), again based on their contractual relationship with the company. A director may be personally relieved of his, her or its liability if he, she, or it proves that he, she, or it did not take part in the alleged breach and that he, she, or it reported such violation to the first general meeting after he, she, or it acquired knowledge thereof. Directors are further liable towards the company and third parties for any fault or negligence causing damage to the company or third parties (general tort liability). In addition the Companies Act lists certain criminal offences for which the directors of a company can be held liable. |
A civil liability claim against directors of a company can be made inter alia by the company and one or several shareholders of the company holding 10% of the securities entitled to vote at the General Meeting that resolved on the quitus given to the director whose liability is sought (available only to shareholders of a public limited liability company) in case of (i) Misconduct of management, or (ii) Violation of the Law of 10 August 1915 on commercial companies, as amended (the Companies Act) or the Articles. The director’s liability for misconduct of management towards the company originates from the contractual relationship between the director and the company and is only applicable to members of the management body contractually mandated by the company, as opposed to de facto directors, who lack the contractual link. Directors who form part of the management body of the company are jointly and severally liable, towards both the company and third parties, for losses resulting from the violation of the Companies Act and the articles of association of a company (the Articles), again based on their contractual relationship with the company. A director may be personally relieved of his, her or its liability if he, she, or it proves that he, she, or it did not take part in the alleged breach and that he, she, or it reported such violation to the first general meeting after he, she, or it acquired knowledge thereof. Directors are further liable towards the company and third parties for any fault or negligence causing damage to the company or third parties (general tort liability). In addition the Companies Act lists certain criminal offences for which the directors of a company can be held liable. |
A civil liability claim against directors of a company can be made inter alia by the company and one or several shareholders of the company holding 10% of the securities entitled to vote at the General Meeting that resolved on the quitus given to the director whose liability is sought (available only to shareholders of a public limited liability company) in case of (i) Misconduct of management, or (ii) Violation of the Law of 10 August 1915 on commercial companies, as amended (the Companies Act) or the Articles. The director’s liability for misconduct of management towards the company originates from the contractual relationship between the director and the company and is only applicable to members of the management body contractually mandated by the company, as opposed to de facto directors, who lack the contractual link. Directors who form part of the management body of the company are jointly and severally liable, towards both the company and third parties, for losses resulting from the violation of the Companies Act and the articles of association of a company (the Articles), again based on their contractual relationship with the company. A director may be personally relieved of his, her or its liability if he, she, or it proves that he, she, or it did not take part in the alleged breach and that he, she, or it reported such violation to the first general meeting after he, she, or it acquired knowledge thereof. Directors are further liable towards the company and third parties for any fault or negligence causing damage to the company or third parties (general tort liability). In addition the Companies Act lists certain criminal offences for which the directors of a company can be held liable. |
A civil liability claim against directors of a company can be made inter alia by the company and one or several shareholders of the company holding 10% of the securities entitled to vote at the General Meeting that resolved on the quitus given to the director whose liability is sought (available only to shareholders of a public limited liability company) in case of (i) Misconduct of management, or (ii) Violation of the Law of 10 August 1915 on commercial companies, as amended (the Companies Act) or the Articles. The director’s liability for misconduct of management towards the company originates from the contractual relationship between the director and the company and is only applicable to members of the management body contractually mandated by the company, as opposed to de facto directors, who lack the contractual link. Directors who form part of the management body of the company are jointly and severally liable, towards both the company and third parties, for losses resulting from the violation of the Companies Act and the articles of association of a company (the Articles), again based on their contractual relationship with the company. A director may be personally relieved of his, her or its liability if he, she, or it proves that he, she, or it did not take part in the alleged breach and that he, she, or it reported such violation to the first general meeting after he, she, or it acquired knowledge thereof. Directors are further liable towards the company and third parties for any fault or negligence causing damage to the company or third parties (general tort liability). In addition the Companies Act lists certain criminal offences for which the directors of a company can be held liable. |
A civil liability claim against directors of a company can be made inter alia by the company and one or several shareholders of the company holding 10% of the securities entitled to vote at the General Meeting that resolved on the quitus given to the director whose liability is sought (available only to shareholders of a public limited liability company) in case of (i) Misconduct of management, or (ii) Violation of the Law of 10 August 1915 on commercial companies, as amended (the Companies Act) or the Articles. The director’s liability for misconduct of management towards the company originates from the contractual relationship between the director and the company and is only applicable to members of the management body contractually mandated by the company, as opposed to de facto directors, who lack the contractual link. Directors who form part of the management body of the company are jointly and severally liable, towards both the company and third parties, for losses resulting from the violation of the Companies Act and the articles of association of a company (the Articles), again based on their contractual relationship with the company. A director may be personally relieved of his, her or its liability if he, she, or it proves that he, she, or it did not take part in the alleged breach and that he, she, or it reported such violation to the first general meeting after he, she, or it acquired knowledge thereof. Directors are further liable towards the company and third parties for any fault or negligence causing damage to the company or third parties (general tort liability). In addition the Companies Act lists certain criminal offences for which the directors of a company can be held liable. |
A civil liability claim against directors of a company can be made inter alia by the company and one or several shareholders of the company holding 10% of the securities entitled to vote at the General Meeting that resolved on the quitus given to the director whose liability is sought (available only to shareholders of a public limited liability company) in case of (i) Misconduct of management, or (ii) Violation of the Law of 10 August 1915 on commercial companies, as amended (the Companies Act) or the Articles. The director’s liability for misconduct of management towards the company originates from the contractual relationship between the director and the company and is only applicable to members of the management body contractually mandated by the company, as opposed to de facto directors, who lack the contractual link. Directors who form part of the management body of the company are jointly and severally liable, towards both the company and third parties, for losses resulting from the violation of the Companies Act and the articles of association of a company (the Articles), again based on their contractual relationship with the company. A director may be personally relieved of his, her or its liability if he, she, or it proves that he, she, or it did not take part in the alleged breach and that he, she, or it reported such violation to the first general meeting after he, she, or it acquired knowledge thereof. Directors are further liable towards the company and third parties for any fault or negligence causing damage to the company or third parties (general tort liability). In addition the Companies Act lists certain criminal offences for which the directors of a company can be held liable. |
Is there a requirement for a register of interest holders?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes. |
Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. | Yes. |
What are the beneficial ownership reporting requirements?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes, any natural person, who ultimately owns or controls a legal entity through direct or indirect ownership of a sufficient percentage of the shares or voting rights of ownership interest in that entity. The AML Law indicates in this respect that a participation of 25% in the given entity shall be an indication of direct ownership. Information on the ultimate beneficiaries must be made available under the register of beneficial owners. |
Yes, any natural person, who ultimately owns or controls a legal entity through direct or indirect ownership of a sufficient percentage of the shares or voting rights of ownership interest in that entity. The AML Law indicates in this respect that a participation of 25% in the given entity shall be an indication of direct ownership. Information on the ultimate beneficiaries must be made available under the register of beneficial owners. | Yes, any natural person, who ultimately owns or controls a legal entity through direct or indirect ownership of a sufficient percentage of the shares or voting rights of ownership interest in that entity. The AML Law indicates in this respect that a participation of 25% in the given entity shall be an indication of direct ownership. Information on the ultimate beneficiaries must be made available under the register of beneficial owners. | Yes, any natural person, who ultimately owns or controls a legal entity through direct or indirect ownership of a sufficient percentage of the shares or voting rights of ownership interest in that entity. The AML Law indicates in this respect that a participation of 25% in the given entity shall be an indication of direct ownership. Information on the ultimate beneficiaries must be made available under the register of beneficial owners. | Yes, any natural person, who ultimately owns or controls a legal entity through direct or indirect ownership of a sufficient percentage of the shares or voting rights of ownership interest in that entity. The AML Law indicates in this respect that a participation of 25% in the given entity shall be an indication of direct ownership. Information on the ultimate beneficiaries must be made available under the register of beneficial owners. | Yes, any natural person, who ultimately owns or controls a legal entity through direct or indirect ownership of a sufficient percentage of the shares or voting rights of ownership interest in that entity. The AML Law indicates in this respect that a participation of 25% in the given entity shall be an indication of direct ownership. Information on the ultimate beneficiaries must be made available under the register of beneficial owners. |
What is the domestic tax treatment?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
− Annual subscription tax of 0.05% of the NAV unless a reduced rate of 0.01% or exemption applies; |
− Annual subscription tax of 0.05% of the NAV unless a reduced rate of 0.01% or exemption applies; − No withholding tax (WHT) on dividends paid. |
− Annual subscription tax of 0.01% of the NAV unless an exemption applies − No withholding tax (WHT) on dividends paid − For SCS/SCSp only: Not subject to corporate income tax, subject to the reverse hybrid mismatch rule (ATAD2) |
− Corporation taxes (corporate income tax, municipal business tax and solidarity surchage) but large exemptions for all income and capital gain derived from transferable securities in connection with eligible risk capital investments − Minimum net wealth tax − No subscription tax − No withholding tax (WHT) on dividends paid − For SCS/SCSp only: Not subject to corporate income tax, subject to the reverse hybrid mismatch rule (ATAD2) |
− Annual subscription tax of 0.01% of the NAV unless an exemption applies − No withholding tax (WHT) on divdends paid − RAIFs investing in risk capital are subject to the tax regime applciable to SICARs − For SCS/SCSp only: Not subject to corporate income tax, subject to the reverse hybrid mismatch rule (ATAD2) |
− No subscription tax − Not subject to municipal business tax as long as the GP holds less than 5% interest and the SCS/SCSp qualifies as AIF or has no commercial activity − Not subject to corporate income tax, subject to the reverse hybrid mismatch rule (ATAD2) |
Is the Fund able to “tick the box” for US tax purposes?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes, except for investment companies in the form of public limited liability companies (sociétés anonyme). |
Yes, except for investment companies in the form of public limited liability companies (sociétés anonyme). | Yes, except for investment companies in the form of public limited liability companies (sociétés anonyme). | Yes, except for investment companies in the form of public limited liability companies (sociétés anonyme). | Yes, except for investment companies in the form of public limited liability companies (sociétés anonyme). | Yes, except for investment companies in the form of public limited liability companies (sociétés anonyme). |
Is there an automatic regulatory regime applicable?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subject to prior CSSF approval. |
Subject to prior CSSF approval. | Subject to prior CSSF approval. | Subject to prior CSSF approval. | Subject to prior CSSF approval. | Subject to prior CSSF approval. |
Is reporting triggered by the form of organisation?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audited annual financial statements; |
Audited annual financial statements; Unaudited semi-annual financial statements. |
Audited annual statements. | Audited annual statements. | Audited annual statements. | Audited annual statements. |
Are annual general shareholder meetings required?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unitholders' meetings are not manadatory for a common Fund; |
Unitholders' meetings are not manadatory for a common Fund; At least one meeting of shareholders must be held annually for investment companies in the corporate form;***** There are no legal requirements to hold an annual general meeting of partners for investment companies in the form of common or special limited partnerships. |
Unitholders' meetings are not manadatory for a common Fund; At least one meeting of shareholders must be held annually for investment companies in the corporate form;***** There are no legal requirements to hold an annual general meeting of partners for investment companies in the form of common or special limited partnerships. |
Unitholders' meetings are not manadatory for a common Fund; At least one meeting of shareholders must be held annually for investment companies in the corporate form;***** There are no legal requirements to hold an annual general meeting of partners for investment companies in the form of common or special limited partnerships. |
Unitholders' meetings are not manadatory for a common Fund; At least one meeting of shareholders must be held annually for investment companies in the corporate form;***** There are no legal requirements to hold an annual general meeting of partners for investment companies in the form of common or special limited partnerships. |
No legal requirements to hold an annual general meeting. |
What are the filing requirements and are these publicly available?
UCITS - Part I of 2010 Law | UCI-Part II of 2010 Law | SIF Law | SICAR Law | RAIF Law | N/A (Unregulated SCS/SCSp) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
− Details of the investment Fund (corporate purpose, registered office, denomination, duration, names of the directors/managers/general partner(s) and their signing authority) must be filed with (and will published by) the RCS; During the life of the investment Fund a number of filings (depending on the legal form) must be made with the RCS, such as: |
− Details of the investment Fund (corporate purpose, registered office, denomination, duration, names of the directors/managers/general partner(s) and their signing authority) must be filed with (and will published by) the RCS; During the life of the investment Fund a number of filings (depending on the legal form) must be made with the RCS, such as: |
− Details of the investment Fund (corporate purpose, registered office, denomination, duration, names of the directors/managers/general partner(s) and their signing authority) must be filed with (and will published by) the RCS; During the life of the investment Fund a number of filings (depending on the legal form) must be made with the RCS, such as: |
− Details of the investment Fund (corporate purpose, registered office, denomination, duration, names of the directors/managers/general partner(s) and their signing authority) must be filed with (and will published by) the RCS; During the life of the investment Fund a number of filings (depending on the legal form) must be made with the RCS, such as: |
− Details of the investment Fund (corporate purpose, registered office, denomination, duration, names of the directors/managers/general partner(s) and their signing authority) must be filed with (and will published by) the RCS; During the life of the investment Fund a number of filings (depending on the legal form) must be made with the RCS, such as: |
− Details of the investment Fund (corporate purpose, registered office, denomination, duration, names of the directors/managers/general partner(s) and their signing authority) must be filed with (and will published by) the RCS; During the life of the investment Fund a number of filings (depending on the legal form) must be made with the RCS, such as: |
Are there any tax treatment considerations?
Please note that the following may be in need of an update.
The basic rule in Luxembourg is that a non-Luxembourg company will be considered as a resident company taxable in Luxembourg on its worldwide profits if the company has its “central administration” in Luxembourg. However, if the non-Luxembourg company qualifies as a UCITS fund or as an AIF, statutory exemptions have been introduced in domestic law in order to avoid any exposure to Luxembourg taxation. Article 179 of the UCITS Law and Article 214 of the AIFMD Law provide an exemption for corporate income tax, municipal business tax and net worth tax purposes for, respectively, investment funds (“undertakings for collective investment”) and AIFs established outside of Luxembourg but having their central administration on the Luxembourg territory.